← Search

David Abel

22 accepted papers

2026

Optimizing Return Distributions with Distributional Dynamic Programming

ICML 2026poster

We introduce distributional dynamic programming (DP) methods for optimizing statistical functionals of the return distribution, with standard reinforcement learning as a special case. Previous distributional DP methods could optimize the same class of expected utilities as classic DP. To go beyond, …

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

A Black Swan Hypothesis: The Role of Human Irrationality in AI Safety

ICLR 2025poster

Black swan events are statistically rare occurrences that carry extremely high risks. A typical view of defining black swan events is heavily assumed to originate from an unpredictable time-varying environments; however, the community lacks a comprehensive definition of black swan events. To this en…

Cited by 1SourcePDFScholar
2025

Enhancing Tactile-based Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Control

NeurIPS 2025poster

Achieving safe, reliable real-world robotic manipulation requires agents to evolve beyond vision and incorporate tactile sensing to overcome sensory deficits and reliance on idealised state information. Despite its potential, the efficacy of tactile sensing in reinforcement learning (RL) remains inc…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2025

Plasticity as the Mirror of Empowerment

NeurIPS 2025spotlight

Agents are minimally entities that are influenced by their past observations and act to influence future observations. This latter capacity is captured by empowerment, which has served as a vital framing concept across artificial intelligence and cognitive science. This former capacity, however, is…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Skill-Driven Neurosymbolic State Abstractions

NeurIPS 2025poster

We consider how to construct state abstractions compatible with a given set of abstract actions, to obtain a well-formed abstract Markov decision process (MDP). We show that the Bellman equation suggests that abstract states should represent distributions over states in the ground MDP; we characteri…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Studying the Interplay Between the Actor and Critic Representations in Reinforcement Learning

ICLR 2025poster

Extracting relevant information from a stream of high-dimensional observations is a central challenge for deep reinforcement learning agents. Actor-critic algorithms add further complexity to this challenge, as it is often unclear whether the same information will be relevant to both the actor and t…

2024

Pragmatic Feature Preferences: Learning Reward-Relevant Preferences from Human Input

ICML 2024poster

Humans use context to specify preferences over behaviors, i.e. their reward functions. Yet, algorithms for inferring reward models from preference data do not take this social learning view into account. Inspired by pragmatic human communication, we study how to extract fine-grained data regarding w…

Cited by 2SourcePDFScholar
2023

A Definition of Continual Reinforcement Learning

NeurIPS 2023poster

In a standard view of the reinforcement learning problem, an agent’s goal is to efficiently identify a policy that maximizes long-term reward. However, this perspective is based on a restricted view of learning as finding a solution, rather than treating learning as endless adaptation. In contrast,…

Cited by 93SourcePDFScholar
2022

On the Expressivity of Markov Reward (Extended Abstract)

IJCAI 2022poster

Reward is the driving force for reinforcement-learning agents. We here set out to understand the expressivity of Markov reward as a way to capture tasks that we would want an agent to perform. We frame this study around three new abstract notions of "task": (1) a set of acceptable behaviors…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2021

Lipschitz Lifelong Reinforcement Learning

AAAI 2021technical

We consider the problem of knowledge transfer when an agent is facing a series of Reinforcement Learning (RL) tasks. We introduce a novel metric between Markov Decision Processes and establish that close MDPs have close optimal value functions. Formally, the optimal value functions are Lipschitz con…

2021

On the Expressivity of Markov Reward

NeurIPS 2021oral

Reward is the driving force for reinforcement-learning agents. This paper is dedicated to understanding the expressivity of reward as a way to capture tasks that we would want an agent to perform. We frame this study around three new abstract notions of “task” that might be desirable: (1) a set of a…

Cited by 117SourcePDFScholar
2021

Revisiting Peng’s Q($λ$) for Modern Reinforcement Learning

ICML 2021spotlight

Off-policy multi-step reinforcement learning algorithms consist of conservative and non-conservative algorithms: the former actively cut traces, whereas the latter do not. Recently, Munos et al. (2016) proved the convergence of conservative algorithms to an optimal Q-function. In contrast, non-conse…

Cited by 26SourcePDFScholar
2020

Value Preserving State-Action Abstractions

AISTATS 2020poster

Abstraction can improve the sample efficiency of reinforcement learning. However, the process of abstraction inherently discards information, potentially compromising an agent’s ability to represent high-value policies. To mitigate this, we here introduce combinations of state abstractions and optio…

Cited by 71SourcePDFScholar
2020

What can I do here? A Theory of Affordances in Reinforcement Learning

ICML 2020poster

Reinforcement learning algorithms usually assume that all actions are always available to an agent. However, both people and animals understand the general link between the features of their environment and the actions that are feasible. Gibson (1977) coined the term "affordances" to describe the fa…

2019

Discovering Options for Exploration by Minimizing Cover Time

ICML 2019oral

One of the main challenges in reinforcement learning is solving tasks with sparse reward. We show that the difficulty of discovering a distant rewarding state in an MDP is bounded by the expected cover time of a random walk over the graph induced by the MDP’s transition dynamics. We therefore propos…

Cited by 64SourcePDFScholar
2019

Finding Options that Minimize Planning Time

ICML 2019oral

We formalize the problem of selecting the optimal set of options for planning as that of computing the smallest set of options so that planning converges in less than a given maximum of value-iteration passes. We first show that the problem is $\NP$-hard, even if the task is constrained to be determ…

Cited by 50SourcePDFScholar
2018

Policy and Value Transfer in Lifelong Reinforcement Learning

ICML 2018oral

We consider the problem of how best to use prior experience to bootstrap lifelong learning, where an agent faces a series of task instances drawn from some task distribution. First, we identify the initial policy that optimizes expected performance over the distribution of tasks for increasingly com…

2018

State Abstractions for Lifelong Reinforcement Learning

ICML 2018oral

In lifelong reinforcement learning, agents must effectively transfer knowledge across tasks while simultaneously addressing exploration, credit assignment, and generalization. State abstraction can help overcome these hurdles by compressing the representation used by an agent, thereby reducing the c…