← Search

Janardhan Kulkarni

23 accepted papers

2026

Dyna-Mind: Learning to Simulate from Experience for Better AI Agents

ICLR 2026poster

Reasoning models have recently shown remarkable progress in domains such as math and coding. However, their expert-level abilities in math and coding contrast sharply with their performance in long-horizon, interactive tasks such as web navigation and computer/phone-use. Inspired by literature on hu…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Contextual Integrity in LLMs via Reasoning and Reinforcement Learning

NeurIPS 2025poster

As the era of autonomous agents making decisions on behalf of users unfolds, ensuring contextual integrity (CI) -- what is the appropriate information to share while carrying out a certain task -- becomes a central question to the field. We posit that CI demands a form of reasoning where the agent…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Towards Foundation Models for Mixed Integer Linear Programming

ICLR 2025poster

Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) is essential for modeling complex decision-making problems but faces challenges in computational tractability and interpretability. Current deep learning approaches for MILP focus on specific problem classes and do not generalize to unseen classes. To address…

2024

Differentially Private Synthetic Data via Foundation Model APIs 1: Images

ICLR 2024poster

Generating differentially private (DP) synthetic data that closely resembles the original private data is a scalable way to mitigate privacy concerns in the current data-driven world. In contrast to current practices that train customized models for this task, we aim to generate DP Synthetic Data vi…

2024

Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning with Differentially Private Few-Shot Generation

ICLR 2024poster

We study the problem of in-context learning (ICL) with large language models (LLMs) on private datasets. This scenario poses privacy risks, as LLMs may leak or regurgitate the private examples demonstrated in the prompt. We propose a novel algorithm that generates synthetic few-shot demonstrations…

2024

Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning

ICLR 2024poster

Positioned between pre-training and user deployment, aligning large language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a prevailing strategy for training instruction following-models such as ChatGPT. In this work, we initiate the study of privacy-preserving alignment of LLMs t…

Cited by 9SourcePDFScholar
2023

Assessing Privacy Risks in Language Models: A Case Study on Summarization Tasks

EMNLP 2023long findings

Large language models have revolutionized the field of NLP by achieving state-of-the-art performance on various tasks. However, there is a concern that these models may disclose information in the training data. In this study, we focus on the summarization task and investigate the membership inferen…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2023

Exploring the Limits of Differentially Private Deep Learning with Group-wise Clipping

ICLR 2023poster

Differentially private deep learning has recently witnessed advances in computational efficiency and privacy-utility trade-off. We explore whether further improvements along the two axes are possible and provide affirmative answers leveraging two instantiations of \emph{group-wise clipping}. To red…

Cited by 52SourcePDFScholar
2022

Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Models

ICLR 2022poster

We give simpler, sparser, and faster algorithms for differentially private fine-tuning of large-scale pre-trained language models, which achieve the state-of-the-art privacy versus utility tradeoffs on many standard NLP tasks. We propose a meta-framework for this problem, inspired by the recent succ…

Cited by 403SourcePDFScholar
2022

Differentially Private Model Compression

NeurIPS 2022accept

Recent papers have shown that large pre-trained language models (LLMs) such as BERT, GPT-2 can be fine-tuned on private data to achieve performance comparable to non-private models for many downstream Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks while simultaneously guaranteeing differential privacy. The…

Cited by 24SourcePDFScholar
2022

When Does Differentially Private Learning Not Suffer in High Dimensions?

NeurIPS 2022accept

Large pretrained models can be fine-tuned with differential privacy to achieve performance approaching that of non-private models. A common theme in these results is the surprising observation that high-dimensional models can achieve favorable privacy-utility trade-offs. This seemingly contradicts k…

2021

Accuracy, Interpretability, and Differential Privacy via Explainable Boosting

ICML 2021spotlight

We show that adding differential privacy to Explainable Boosting Machines (EBMs), a recent method for training interpretable ML models, yields state-of-the-art accuracy while protecting privacy. Our experiments on multiple classification and regression datasets show that DP-EBM models suffer surpris…

2021

Fast and Memory Efficient Differentially Private-SGD via JL Projections

NeurIPS 2021poster

Differentially Private-SGD (DP-SGD) of Abadi et al. and its variations are the only known algorithms for private training of large scale neural networks. This algorithm requires computation of per-sample gradients norms which is extremely slow and memory intensive in practice. In this paper, we pres…

Cited by 48SourcePDFScholar
2020

Differentially Private Set Union

ICML 2020poster

We study the basic operation of set union in the global model of differential privacy. In this problem, we are given a universe $U$ of items, possibly of infinite size, and a database $D$ of users. Each user $i$ contributes a subset $W_i \subseteq U$ of items. We want an ($\epsilon$,$\delta$)-differ…

2019

An Algorithmic Framework For Differentially Private Data Analysis on Trusted Processors

NeurIPS 2019poster

Differential privacy has emerged as the main definition for private data analysis and machine learning. The global model of differential privacy, which assumes that users trust the data collector, provides strong privacy guarantees and introduces small errors in the output. In contrast, applications…

Cited by 48SourcePDFScholar