← Search

Ellie Pavlick

37 accepted papers

2026

Different Usage of Shared Components Explains Behavioral Variance in LLMs

ICML 2026poster

One of the most common complaints about large language models (LLMs) is their prompt sensitivity---i.e., the fact that their ability to perform a task or provide a correct answer to a question can depend unpredictably on the way the question is posed. We investigate this variation by comparing two v…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

Is This Just Fantasy? Language Model Representations Reflect Human Judgments of Event Plausibility

ICLR 2026poster

Language models (LMs) are used for a diverse range of tasks, from question answering to writing fantastical stories. In order to reliably accomplish these tasks, LMs must be able to discern the modal category of a sentence (i.e., whether it describes something that is possible, impossible, completel…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

A Knapsack by Any Other Name: Presentation impacts LLM performance on NP-hard problems

EMNLP 2025

To investigate the effect of problem presentation on LLMs’ ability to solve optimization problems, we introduce the dataset of Everyday Hard Optimization Problems (EHOP), a collection of NP-hard problems expressed in natural language. EHOP includes problem formulations that could be found in compute

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

Born a Transformer -- Always a Transformer? On the Effect of Pretraining on Architectural Abilities

NeurIPS 2025poster

Transformers have theoretical limitations in modeling certain sequence-to-sequence tasks, yet it remains largely unclear if these limitations play a role in large-scale pretrained LLMs, or whether LLMs might effectively overcome these constraints in practice due to the scale of both the models thems…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Dual Process Learning: Controlling Use of In-Context vs. In-Weights Strategies with Weight Forgetting

ICLR 2025poster

Language models have the ability to perform in-context learning (ICL), allowing them to flexibly adapt their behavior based on context. This contrasts with in-weights learning (IWL), where memorized information is encoded in model parameters after iterated observations of data. An ideal model shoul…

Cited by 6SourcePDFScholar
2025

Paths Not Taken: Understanding and Mending the Multilingual Factual Recall Pipeline

EMNLP 2025

Multilingual large language models (LLMs) often exhibit factual inconsistencies across languages, usually with better performance in factual recall tasks in high-resource languages than in other languages. The causes of these failures, however, remain poorly understood. Using mechanistic analysis te

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

The Same but Different: Structural Similarities and Differences in Multilingual Language Modeling

ICLR 2025poster

We employ new tools from mechanistic interpretability to ask whether the internal structure of large language models (LLMs) shows correspondence to the linguistic structures which underlie the languages on which they are trained. In particular, we ask (1) when two languages employ the same morphosyn…

Cited by 2SourcePDFScholar
2025

Transferring Linear Features Across Language Models With Model Stitching

NeurIPS 2025spotlight

In this work, we demonstrate that affine mappings between residual streams of language models is a cheap way to effectively transfer represented features between models. We apply this technique to transfer the \textit{weights} of Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) between models of different sizes to compar…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2024

Beyond the Doors of Perception: Vision Transformers Represent Relations Between Objects

NeurIPS 2024poster

Though vision transformers (ViTs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in a variety of settings, they exhibit surprising failures when performing tasks involving visual relations. This begs the question: how do ViTs attempt to perform tasks that require computing visual relations between objec…

2024

Circuit Component Reuse Across Tasks in Transformer Language Models

ICLR 2024spotlight

Recent work in mechanistic interpretability has shown that behaviors in language models can be successfully reverse-engineered through circuit analysis. A common criticism, however, is that each circuit is task-specific, and thus such analysis cannot contribute to understanding the models at a highe…

2024

Language Models Implement Simple Word2Vec-style Vector Arithmetic

NAACL 2024long

A primary criticism towards language models (LMs) is their inscrutability. This paper presents evidence that, despite their size and complexity, LMs sometimes exploit a simple vector arithmetic style mechanism to solve some relational tasks using regularities encoded in the hidden space of the model…

2024

Re-Evaluating Evaluation for Multilingual Summarization

EMNLP 2024main

Automatic evaluation approaches (ROUGE, BERTScore, LLM-based evaluators) have been widely used to evaluate summarization tasks. Despite the complexities of script differences and tokenization, these approaches have been indiscriminately applied to summarization across multiple languages. While previ…

2024

Talking Heads: Understanding Inter-Layer Communication in Transformer Language Models

NeurIPS 2024poster

Although it is known that transformer language models (LMs) pass features from early layers to later layers, it is not well understood how this information is represented and routed by the model. We analyze a mechanism used in two LMs to selectively inhibit items in a context in one task, and find t…

Cited by 10SourcePDFScholar
2024

mOthello: When Do Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment and Cross-Lingual Transfer Emerge in Multilingual Models?

NAACL 2024findings

Many pretrained multilingual models exhibit cross-lingual transfer ability, which is often attributed to a learned language-neutral representation during pretraining. However, it remains unclear what factors contribute to the learning of a language-neutral representation, and whether the learned lan…

2023

Are Language Models Worse than Humans at Following Prompts? It's Complicated

EMNLP 2023short findings

Prompts have been the center of progress in advancing language models' zero-shot and few-shot performance. However, recent work finds that models can perform surprisingly well when given intentionally irrelevant or misleading prompts. Such results may be interpreted as evidence that model behavior i…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2023

Break It Down: Evidence for Structural Compositionality in Neural Networks

NeurIPS 2023spotlight

Though modern neural networks have achieved impressive performance in both vision and language tasks, we know little about the functions that they implement. One possibility is that neural networks implicitly break down complex tasks into subroutines, implement modular solutions to these subroutines…

2023

Emergence of Abstract State Representations in Embodied Sequence Modeling

EMNLP 2023long main

Decision making via sequence modeling aims to mimic the success of language models, where actions taken by an embodied agent are modeled as tokens to predict. Despite their promising performance, it remains unclear if embodied sequence modeling leads to the emergence of internal representations that…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2023

Linearly Mapping from Image to Text Space

ICLR 2023poster

The extent to which text-only language models (LMs) learn to represent the physical, non-linguistic world is an open question. Prior work has shown that pretrained LMs can be taught to ``understand'' visual inputs when the models' parameters are updated on image captioning tasks. We test a stronger…

2022

Evaluation beyond Task Performance: Analyzing Concepts in AlphaZero in Hex

NeurIPS 2022accept

AlphaZero, an approach to reinforcement learning that couples neural networks and Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS), has produced state-of-the-art strategies for traditional board games like chess, Go, shogi, and Hex. While researchers and game commentators have suggested that AlphaZero uses concepts t…

2022

The MultiBERTs: BERT Reproductions for Robustness Analysis

ICLR 2022spotlight

Experiments with pre-trained models such as BERT are often based on a single checkpoint. While the conclusions drawn apply to the artifact tested in the experiment (i.e., the particular instance of the model), it is not always clear whether they hold for the more general procedure which includes the…

2021

AND does not mean OR: Using Formal Languages to Study Language Models’ Representations

ACL 2021short

A current open question in natural language processing is to what extent language models, which are trained with access only to the form of language, are able to capture the meaning of language. This question is challenging to answer in general, as there is no clear line between meaning and form, bu…

Cited by 25SourcePDFScholar
2021

Frequency Effects on Syntactic Rule Learning in Transformers

EMNLP 2021main

Pre-trained language models perform well on a variety of linguistic tasks that require symbolic reasoning, raising the question of whether such models implicitly represent abstract symbols and rules. We investigate this question using the case study of BERT’s performance on English subject–verb agre…

2021

Which Linguist Invented the Lightbulb? Presupposition Verification for Question-Answering

ACL 2021long

Many Question-Answering (QA) datasets contain unanswerable questions, but their treatment in QA systems remains primitive. Our analysis of the Natural Questions (Kwiatkowski et al. 2019) dataset reveals that a substantial portion of unanswerable questions (~21%) can be explained based on the presenc…

2021

“Was it “stated” or was it “claimed”?: How linguistic bias affects generative language models

EMNLP 2021main

People use language in subtle and nuanced ways to convey their beliefs. For instance, saying claimed instead of said casts doubt on the truthfulness of the underlying proposition, thus representing the author’s opinion on the matter. Several works have identified such linguistic classes of words tha…

Cited by 20SourcePDFScholar
2020

Grounding Language to Landmarks in Arbitrary Outdoor Environments

ICRA 2020poster

Robots operating in outdoor, urban environments need the ability to follow complex natural language commands which refer to never-before-seen landmarks. Existing approaches to this problem are limited because they require training a language model for the landmarks of a particular environment before…

Cited by 29SourceScholar
2020

Grounding Language to Non-Markovian Tasks with No Supervision of Task Specifications

RSS 2020poster

Natural language instructions often exhibit sequential constraints rather than being simply goal-oriented, for example ``go around the lake and then travel north until the intersection''. Existing approaches map these kinds of natural language expressions to Linear Temporal Logic expressions but req…

Cited by 34SourcePDFScholar
2020

Robot Object Retrieval with Contextual Natural Language Queries

RSS 2020poster

Natural language object retrieval is a highly useful yet challenging task for robots in human-centric environments. Previous work has primarily focused on commands specifying the desired object's type such as "scissors" and/or visual attributes such as "red," thus limiting the robot to only known ob…

2019

Planning with State Abstractions for Non-Markovian Task Specifications

RSS 2019poster

Often times, we specify tasks for a robot using temporal language that can also span different levels of abstraction. The example command "go to the kitchen before going to the second floor" contains spatial abstraction, given that "floor" consists of individual rooms that can also be referred to in…

2019

What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations

ICLR 2019poster

Contextualized representation models such as ELMo (Peters et al., 2018a) and BERT (Devlin et al., 2018) have recently achieved state-of-the-art results on a diverse array of downstream NLP tasks. Building on recent token-level probing work, we introduce a novel edge probing task design and construct…

Cited by 1017SourcePDFScholar